US First Lady Michelle Obama's New Nutrition Facts Label Design Is Not Based On Science, According To Scientists

Just last week, the White House and Food Drug Administration (FDA) were rejoicing for the finalization of the newly-redesigned Nutrition Facts label to be printed on food packages. However before its implementation, scientists are skeptical about the new design, saying that it is not supported by science.

A group of scientists submitted a letter to the Office of Management and Budget in opposition to the new design of the Nutrition Facts label. They argued that it was based on the 2015 Dietary Guidelines that was done by a committee without an expert from a relevant field (via Fox News).

"In addition to the widely controversial nature of its report, it is critical to note that this committee did not include a single member with a specific expertise in sugars (or any carbohydrate) metabolism. As nutrition scientists and health professionals, we feel this is of significant concern," the scientists' letter read as published by American Thinker.

The new Nutrition Facts label is part of First Lady Michelle Obama's Let's Move campaign. It aims to help consumers especially parents to make informed choices on how healthy a certain food item is before purchase.

Parent Herald reported that the new design will list Added Sugars, enlarge calorie amounts, and provide the maximum recommended serving. This new format and additional content should be provided by manufacturers after the next two years.

"The updated label makes improvements to this valuable resource so consumers can make informed food choices- one of the most important steps a person can take to reduce the risk of heart disease and obesity," FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, M.D. said in a press release from The White House.

First Lady Michelle Obama regards the "Added Sugars" the most important element in the new design of the Nutrition Facts Label. However, the concerned scientists say it doesn't have enough "scientific rigor." The update will also cost manufacturers $640 million and a net social cost of $1.4 billion (via Fox News).

Which side are you on: the government or the scientists? Do you think the new Nutrition Facts food label is for the better or will it just incur unnecessary costs? Share your thoughts below in the ocmments section!