Montana Governor Signs Bill Defining 'Sex' as Male or Female, LGBTQ+ Advocates Protest

Montana Bill Defining Sex lgbtq

By E.Baloyo , Parent Herald May 22, 09:47 pm

Photo: (Photo : Justin Sullivan/ Getty Images)

Montana passed a new bill defining sex, sparking backlash for the lack of inclusivity of the LGBTQ+.

Montana's Governor, Greg Gianforte, has signed a bill into law that defines "sex" in the state as strictly binary-male or female-and unchangeable, making Montana the fourth state to enact such legislation.

The move has ignited a firestorm of debate, with supporters asserting it reinforces common sense, while critics argue it is an attempt to erase the LGBTQ+ community.

The bill's signing follows the governor's recent authorization of a separate bill banning gender-affirming treatments for transgender minors.

Montana's Controversial Bill Defining 'Sex'

The recently enacted Senate Bill 458 is scheduled to take effect on October 1.

According to the Daily Mail, the bill establishes a definition of "sex" based on biological factors such as the presence of XY or XX chromosomes and the ability to produce sperm or eggs through typical development processes.

It explicitly differentiates between sex and gender, stating that individuals are free to identify with whatever gender they choose while emphasizing that sex remains fixed and immutable.

The legislation also includes an amendment addressing intersex individuals, stating that the definitions of male and female encompass those who would fall within these categories if not for a biological or genetic condition.

However, critics argue that this phrasing falls short of acknowledging the full spectrum of intersex traits and may not sufficiently protect the rights of intersex individuals.

Medical experts hold varying opinions on the prevalence of intersex individuals within the population.

Some assert that the figure is as high as 1.7 percent, a number referenced by the United Nations, while others estimate it as low as 0.018 percent.

While the legislation acknowledges intersex individuals, critics argue that it fails to adequately consider the diverse range of intersex characteristics and the implications of the law on their rights and recognition.

As reported by KEYT, several states, including Kansas and Tennessee, are following Montana's lead by considering or implementing legislation that defines "sex" in a way that restricts residents from modifying the gender markers on their birth certificates and driver's licenses.

The laws in Kansas and Tennessee are set to become effective on July 1, further limiting the options for individuals seeking to update their official identification documents.

LGBTQ+ Advocates Protest, Claiming Legal Misdefinition

The signing of the bill has sparked strong opposition from LGBTQ+ advocates, who argue that the law misdefines and excludes transgender and nonbinary individuals.

According to the Associated Press, the president of the Montana chapter of the American Academy of Pediatricians, Lauren Wilson, contested the accuracy of the bill's claim that there are only two sexes from a medical perspective.

Wilson argued that the bill's assertion does not align with the nuanced understanding of sex that exists within the medical community, highlighting the complexities and variations that exist beyond a strict binary classification.

Critics, including transgender lawmakers SJ Howell and Zooey Zephyr, both Democrats from Missoula, contend that the legislation effectively erases their legal recognition and diminishes their rights under state law.

Protests against the bill have erupted across Montana, with activists emphasizing the importance of acknowledging and respecting the full spectrum of gender identities.

LGBTQ+ advocacy organizations, such as the Human Rights Campaign and the ACLU of Montana, have been at the forefront of the opposition, voicing concerns about the potential marginalization of transgender and nonbinary communities.

The governor's press secretary, Kaitlin Price, defended the law, stating that it upholds a biologically-based understanding of sex while preserving the ability of transgender individuals to identify with their chosen gender.

However, critics argue that the bill's narrow definition of sex undermines the complexity and diversity of human biology and disregards the experiences and identities of individuals who do not fit within traditional binary categories.

The controversy surrounding the bill highlights the ongoing battle between those advocating for strict binary definitions and those advocating for inclusivity and recognition of diverse gender identities.

As the law takes effect later this year, its repercussions and legal challenges are likely to continue shaping the discourse surrounding LGBTQ+ rights and equality in Montana and beyond.